Trapping Questions and Evolving Answers

A voice said, Look me in the stars
And tell me truly, men of earth,
If all the soul-and-body scars
Were not too much to pay for birth.

—- “A Question” By Robert Frost

In research, as in life, humble questions can sometimes lead to profound answers. A curious question flying as a passing thought in the mind of a researcher can equally lead to some important discoveries and inventions. Furthermore, what starts as a simple question, evolves into a creature that the questioners themselves would have not envisaged. This evolution of thought in various directions is fascinating to say the least, and history of science is dotted with such examples.

Take for example Arthur Ashkin of Bell Labs, who in late 1960s, asked the following question:

“is it possible to observe significant motion of small particles using the forces of radiation pressure from laser light?”

 Note- at that point of time, lasers were still a relatively new invention, and people were looking for an application. In that context, it was indeed an interesting question to ask about the effect of laser beam on a small particle which may be immersed in fluid or in vacuum. After all, radiation pressure should have some effect on the motion of particles, as evidenced in the case of comet tails.

With this question, Ashkin embarked on a journey that conceptually and literally pushed and revolutionized a large part of our science and technology based on lasers. Ashkin’s question led to the realization of laser-based optical trap of microscopic objects, which further evolved into a major experimental tool not only in physics but also in biology and chemistry.

Below figure shows the conceptual schematic of Ashkin’s experiment, in which he introduced two counter-propagating laser beam which created an optical potential to stably trap an object in space and time. The physics of optical trapping itself in intriguing, in which, the compelling battle between forces due to in-line pushing and orthogonal pulling will be eventually won by the pulling component.  A stable energy minimum is achieved at the center of the focused laser beam, in which the object of interest happily resides. Of course, parameters such as refractive index of the object and the medium play a critical role, so does the alignment of laser beam and its wavelength.

 There are two important aspects to Ashkin’s work. One is that he pursued on a simple question that lead to an important observation, which has had far researching consequences not only in physics but also in biology and allied research areas, and the second point is that a few people, in his own lab felt that the discovery was not important. In the first chapter of his book, Ashkin describes a very interesting situation after he had performed this seminal work:

 It may be interesting and instructive to recall the initial reactions of other scientists to paper [1]*, which described the earliest trapping work. At Bell Labs., before a manuscript could be sent out to a journal it had to undergo an internal review to make sure it would not tarnish the laboratory’s excellent reputation in research. Since paper [1]*was intended for Physical Review Letters, it was sent to the theoretical physics department for comment. The Bell Labs, internal reviewer made only four points: (i) there was no new physics here, (ii) the reviewer could not actually find anything wrong with the work (this is a reminiscent of the famous Pauli insult, when he commented on some work he thought worthless that “it is not even wrong!”), (iii) the work could probably be published somewhere, and (iv) but not in Phys. Rev. Lett.This four-point internal referee report from the theoretical group greatly distressed me, and so I went to my boss, Rudi Kompfner, inventor of the traveling wave tube, whom I greatly admired. Rudi, a man usually slow to anger, simply said, “Hell, just send it in!” As it turned out, I had no problem whatever with the Physical Review Letters reviewers. In 1999, paper [1]* had the honor of being selected as one of the 23 seminal papers on atomic physics reprinted in the compilation, “The Physical Review — The First Hundred Years”, edited by Henry Stroke, American Institute of Physics Press and Springer Verlag (1999) on the occasion of the centennial of the American Physical Society.

There are at least two important lessons in this story: a) not always one can instantaneously judge the importance of a research work and b) the notion of “new physics” depends on how you look at a topic and judge its implication. To see how a new result can connect to something else requires a kind of broad view of science well beyond the boundaries of the “known unknowns”.

Going further, Ashkin did not stop his train of questions. He writes that he was intrigued by the observations which further motivated him to explore on the following topics:

Could traps be observed for macroscopic particles in other media such as air or even in a vacuum? Could optical manipulation be used as a practical tool for studying light scattering, for example, and other properties of small macroscopic particles?

Evolution of Ideas

After some resistance, slowly the physics community started taking notice of Ashkin’s experiments, and paid more attention towards the simple yet powerful methods he was developing. What followed was indeed a revolution. The methods he developed immediately caught the attention of two very diverse research communities – one was of atomic physicists and other one was of biologists. Whereas the former were interested in trapping and cooling atoms, the later were in desperate search for non-invasive optical tools that could trap and manipulate cellular and sub-cellular objects. Optical trapping indeed catered enormously towards these research efforts. It not only led to “new and interesting physics”, but also some wonderful experiments in soft-matter and biological sciences. In order to give you a gist of the way Ashkin’s work evolved, below I give a table of interesting research results. As you will see, the papers themselves discuss topics and problems that were not envisaged by Ashkin, but the influence of his ideas percolated deep and wide.

Year	Link to the relevant papers and my comments
1982	Electromagnetic mirrors for neutral atomsThis paper theoretically proposed use of evanescent optical fields at dielectric-vaccum interface to reflect neutral atoms. The concept of radiation pressure at an interface was emphasized.
1986	·       Three-dimensional viscous confinement and cooling of atoms by resonance radiation pressure·       Experimental observation of optically trapped atoms These were the foundational experiments on laser cooling and trapping of atoms, which went on to win the 1997 Nobel Prize in physics. Note that Ashkin missed out on the prize!
1989	Optical Binding This introduced a fascinating concept of binding microscopic objects with long range optical forces facilitated by electromagnetic fields. This topic is still of great interest, and still inspires a variety of experiments.
1992	Movement of micrometer-sized particles in the evanescent field of a laser beam This paper was a pioneering contribution towards movement of particles in fluids using an evanescent wave of laser beam.
1993	Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry The abstract of this paper is worth a read and tells a compelling story :“Do biological motors move with regular steps? To address this question, we constructed instrumentation with the spatial and temporal sensitivity to resolve movement on a molecular scale. We deposited silica beads carrying single molecules of the motor protein kinesin on microtubules using optical tweezers and analysed their motion under controlled loads by interferometry. We find that kinesin moves with 8-nm steps.”
1996	Optical vortex trapping of particles This was one of the first experiments to use vortex beams to trap objects. In conclusion of the paper, the authors envisage trapping application based on holograms, which were created soon after the proposal.
1997	Theory of nanometric tweezerA first significant jump towards extrapolating optical trapping to sub-wavelength scales. The idea of utilizing a metal nano-tip to trap dielectric objects was proposed. This paper laid an excellent foundation for optical manipulation at nanometer scale.
1998	Optical tweezer arrays and optical substrates created with diffractive optics This literally added new dimensions to optical trapping, where a diffractive optical element, a static hologram in this case, was introduced in the optical scheme. This laid the foundation towards parallel trapping on conventional set-up, and has turned out to be extremely useful for applications in soft-matter physics and biological applications.
2001	Force of surface plasmon-coupled evanescent fields on Mie particles This theoretical paper compares how evanescently-excited surface plasmon polaritons at metal-dielectric interface can exert more force on Mie particle compared to a dielectric-dielectric interface, thus creating a platform for film-based plasmonic manipulation of micro-objects.
2006	Surface Plasmon Radiation Forces This was the first report that experimentally showed how surface plasmon from a metal interface exerted about 40 times more force on a micron sized particles compared to a dielectric interface. Importantly, this paper measure the trapping potential depths created by surface plasmon on a metal-film.
2007	Parallel and selective trapping in a patterned plasmonic landscape This was perhaps THE BREAKTHROUGH experiment in plasmonic trapping,  that showed how gold nano-disc could create parallel traps  of micron scale object at significantly lower power compared to optical trapping. A majority of plasmon trapping experiments nowadays derive their inspiration from this paper
2009	Self-induced back-action optical trapping of dielectric nanoparticles This experimental paper is one of the first reports which harness the feedback from the trapped 50 nm object to improve the performance of the trap. This significantly reduces the power of laser one needs to use for trapping experiments and represents truly a nanometric optical trap.
2010	Laser Printing Single Gold NanoparticlesOptical trapping forces are harnessed to printing individual gold nanoparticles on glass substrates. This has opened up new opportunities to directly fabricate nanostructure from colloidal phase onto a surface of interest.
2012	Subkelvin Parametric Feedback Cooling of a Laser-Trapped Nanoparticle To quote the authors “Using a single laser beam for both trapping and cooling we demonstrate a temperature compression ratio of four orders of magnitude”. This opens a new avenue to perform optical tests of quantum mechanics using isolated nanoparticles.
2014	Plasmofluidic Single-Molecule Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering from Dynamic Assembly of Plasmonic NanoparticlesThis is an experiment report from my group where we showed that one could not only create a large scale plasmonic trap of multiple nanoparticles, but also one can utilize it to perform single-molecule spectroscopy.
2016	Direct Measurement of Photon Recoil from a Levitated Nanoparticle Another experimental breakthrough where the photon recoil from a single nanoparticle is measured.
2018	Opto-thermoelectric nanotweezers This experimental paper shows how optical, thermo-plasmonic and electric fields can be combined to trap and manipulate nano-object in fluids.

To conclude I will again quote Ashkin, who makes an important observation in an editorial he wrote on the occasion of commemorating 50 years after the discovery of laser:

As we look to the future, what can we anticipate? Certainly much more of the present hot fields such as: single atom studies; properties and behavior of single biological molecules such as mechanoenzymes and nucleic acids; mechanical properties of single molecules and tissue; studies of particle arrays; and particle separation schemes. Of course, we cannot anticipate serendipitous discoveries. We can only hope to recognize them when they occur.

After all, one question leads to another….and the rest is evolution…you see!